Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.721771
Title: Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis and fibromyalgia : a social model of disability perspective
Author: Barcroft, Rachel
Awarding Body: Lancaster University
Current Institution: Lancaster University
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 25 Jul 2018
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis is composed firstly of a literature review focusing on the attitudes of health professionals towards chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) and fibromyalgia. Secondly, a research paper explores the ways in which people living with CFS/ME have experienced psycho-emotional disablism. Finally, a critical appraisal discusses the process of conducting the research as well as its strengths and limitations. The literature review takes the form of a meta-synthesis regarding the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards CFS/ME and fibromyalgia. A meta-ethnographic approach was used with reciprocal translation producing the following themes: “Feeling hopeless and more hopeless”: psychological effects of lack of knowledge; “Your heart sinks when they come in the room”: stigma and stereotypes; and “I’m going to be with you through thick and thin”: management of the condition. The review highlights the difficulties faced by health professionals regarding the management and diagnosis of both conditions, as well as possible reasons for the negative attitudes held by some professionals. The research paper, which employed thematic analysis, explores the ways in which people living with CFS/ME have experienced psycho-emotional disablism. Three overarching themes were identified: “fighting to be heard”; “lack of legitimacy” and “feeling invisible”. Participants described the discrimination and stigma that they had encountered from many areas of society. Ideas for future research are proposed. The critical appraisal presents the author’s reflections on the research process as well as its strengths and limitations, and the five stages of the process are described as follows: choosing a thesis topic and designing the project; recruitment and research interviews; the interview process; analysis and writing up of the data; and the author’s reflections on the project.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.721771  DOI:
Share: