Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.707597
Title: Queen Bea : a novel ; and, No me without you : how concepts of self as mutable and multiple shaped the YA novel Queen Bea
Author: Nadin, J.
ISNI:       0000 0004 6062 9097
Awarding Body: Bath Spa University
Current Institution: Bath Spa University
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This dissertation comprises a young adult novel and contextualising thesis. The novel Queen Bea explores concepts of multiple self and narcissism as normative states for adolescents. The contextualising thesis is an intensely personal piece. It charts not only the transformation of the novel following research into the concept of mutable and multiple self, but also the author’s own metamorphoses from childhood, through adulthood, into her own acceptance of multiple selves, and the implications for her writing. It comprises an introduction, four chapters and a conclusion. The introduction sets out the scope, methodology and limitations, as well as offering an insight into Nadin’s interest in ‘self’. In the opening chapter she discusses the background to Queen Bea, including the teenage transformations that have characterised her work, contextualising the work within the YA tradition of ‘quest for self’ novels. In Chapter 2 she looks at the influence the concepts of a ‘mutable and multiple’ self and ‘necessary narcissism’ had on her thinking and on the structure and content of the novel, in particular referencing Julian Baggini, Bruce Hood, Erik Erikson and Elizabeth Lunbeck. Chapter 3 attempts to situate her work within the context of other YA literature that has explored mutable or multiple self, including David Levithan’s novel Every Day. Chapter 4 looks in greater detail at some of the ways in which she has tried to weave her thoughts on self and self-obsession into plot, form and characterisation in the final draft of Queen Bea. She concludes by discussing whether or not she believes Queen Bea achieves what she set out to achieve, and what the implications are going forward. This is followed by appendices and a bibliography.
Supervisor: Voake, S. Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.707597  DOI: Not available
Share: