Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.702530
Title: Antibiotics prescribing by general practitioners for urinary tract infections in elderly patients
Author: Alomar, Hussain Abdulrahman
ISNI:       0000 0004 6058 137X
Awarding Body: King's College London
Current Institution: King's College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the second most common infection seen by general practitioners (GPs) in the elderly. UTIs in the elderly can lead to serious complications with increased risk of mortality, yet there are no national or international dedicated guidelines for antibiotic treatment in this patient group. The epidemiology of UTIs in the United Kingdom (UK) for the elderly population and GPs’ antibiotics prescribing for this condition have received little or no attention. This thesis describes GPs’ antibiotics prescribing for UTIs in elderly patients in the UK by exploring the prevalence of UTIs in elderly patients, auditing GPs’ antibiotics prescribing, explaining the variations in GPs’ views and perceptions and identifying the factors that may influence or affect GPs’ antibiotics prescribing using a mixed methods approach. To achieve research aim, a comprehensive explanatory sequential mixed methods approach was undertaken. The initial research was quantitative and took the form of a retrospective, cross-sectional, drug utilisation study that included elderly patients’ data retrieved from electronics medical records, namely, Disease Analyzer (IMS-DA), for the period between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2012. The subsequent research was qualitative and took a phenomenographic approach with two analytical techniques: phenomenographic analysis and thematic analysis, with data collected through semistructured interviews with 17 GPs. The results from the quantitative study identified 77,290 UTI visits by 21,150 elderly patients, of whom 77.42% (N = 16,375) received at least one antibiotic prescription per visit over the study period. The mean age and sex adjusted UTI prevalence was found to be 23.35 (95% CI 21.84-24.85) per 1,000 person-years for year 2010, 21.44 (95% CI 19.99-22.88) per 1,000 person-years for year 2011 and 17.88 (95% CI 16.56-19.19) per 1,000 person-years. The total number of issued antibiotics prescriptions for UTIs during the study period was 37,815. Adherence results showed that 9,125 (24.1%) broadspectrum antibiotics prescriptions were issued for elderly patients, including ciprofloxacin (N = 1,733; 4.6%), co-amoxiclav (N = 2,350; 6.2%) and cephalexin (N = 5,042; 13.3%). Additionally, 32.2% (N = 12,159) of antibiotics prescriptions were prescribed for durations other than those recommended either for treatment or for prophylaxis; this was seen in 10,605 (33%) female patients’ UTI antibiotics prescriptions and 1,554 (27.5%) male patients’ UTI antibiotics prescriptions. The findings from the qualitative study identified five distinct categories of description representing the ways in which GPs perceive antibiotics prescribing in elderly patients with UTIs. These categories are perceptions, knowledge, decision, practice and approach. Moreover, GPs’ knowledge and perceptions about antibiotics were found to be shaped through seven external horizons: undergraduate education, postgraduate training, personal experience, interaction with peers, interaction and influence of patients’ expectations, the healthcare system, and availability of guidelines and evidence. Additionally, the thematic analysis revealed 29 factors that may influence GPs’ antibiotics prescribing for UTIs including: GPs’ personal experience and familiarity with specific antibiotics, GPs’ education, knowledge and training, complacency, GPs’ fear, responsibility of other healthcare professionals, GPs’ awareness about antibiotic resistance threat, GPs’ awareness about microbial resistance results and information GPs’ awareness about local resistance pattern, GPs’ antibiotic prescribing concerns, diagnosis and clinical decision making by GPs’, GPs’ ethos and ethical values, patient’s age and gender, patient’s medical history and clinical characteristics, patient’s social situation and living conditions, patient’s level of understanding and knowledge, patient’s desire for a quick fix, patient’s autonomy, visits and education by prescribing advisors, audit, monitoring and feedback of prescribing, influence by secondary care doctor prescribing practice, implementation of local policies, guidance and formulary, time, guidelines and evidence, antibiotics shortage, incentives, media, cost, healthcare resources and constraints, pharmaceutical companies, over-prescribing and society experience and expectation. In conclusion, the findings from the mixed methods research confirmed that some GPs in the UK are less likely to adhere to available good practice points for the management of UTIs in elderly patients, that there are variations among GPs’ views and perceptions about antibiotics and that GPs’ antibiotics prescribing practice is influenced by various factors such as guidelines, complacency, clinical presentation, resistance, and audit and feedback. The results highlight the need to optimise and rationalise GPs’ antibiotics prescribing in the elderly by developing robust guidelines synthesised specifically for the elderly population based on studies and evidence from literature designed for elderly patients, to increase GPs’ awareness of and familiarity with guidelines, to increase their uptake and involve GPs in the process of evidence synthesis because of their knowledge of the context of general practice. There is also a need to implement a multifaceted intensive approach with the aim of minimising variations in GPs’ views for AMR and approaching elderly patients, modifying GPs’ antibiotics perceptions and determining whether they will change their practice, correcting some GPs’ misperceptions such as patients’ expectations of antibiotics and patients’ satisfaction through encouraging communication and targeting the GPs’ seven external horizons through multifaceted educational programmes.
Supervisor: Jones, Susan Catherine ; Long, Paul Frederick Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.702530  DOI: Not available
Share: