Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.695298
Title: An exploration of rhetorical structure and interactional metadiscourse in architecture research articles
Author: Chang, Ping-Nan
ISNI:       0000 0004 5994 9886
Awarding Body: Queen's University Belfast
Current Institution: Queen's University Belfast
Date of Award: 2015
Availability of Full Text:
Full text unavailable from EThOS.
Please contact the current institution’s library for further details.
Abstract:
Based on John Swales's (1990) concept of the rhetorical move and Ken Hyland's (2005) model of interactional metadiscourse, the research provides a textual analysis of 14 research papers from The Journal of Architecture, which were published in 2010 and 2011. Key findings from the move analysis include the prevalence of nonepistemic introductions, the lack of distinctive Method, Results and Discussion sections, and the saliency of rhetorical moves to contextualise, describe and evaluate an architectural case, and a possible classification of papers according to move frequency in each text. The metadiscourse analysis demonstrates the prominence of engagement markers (despite hedges being the most common category), and variations in metadiscourse features among the articles in terms of frequency of occurrence. The textual phenomena observed in this study also differentiate between the sample articles and empirical research articles. To complement the textual analysis, two architecture lecturers completed an open-ended questionnaire concerning the disciplinarity of architecture. Based on the findings, it is suggested that genre analysis be transformed into a teaching method to familiarise students with linguistic uses and conventions and raise their awareness about the complexity of the world in which a genre is situated. The possible relationship between language and discipline, as manifested in this research, further implies a potential to incorporate ESP elements into English language teaching in higher education.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Ed.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.695298  DOI: Not available
Share: