Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.694152
Title: The talking, being, and becoming, of autism, childhood, and dis/ability
Author: Smith, Jill C.
ISNI:       0000 0004 5990 1831
Awarding Body: University of Sheffield
Current Institution: University of Sheffield
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 01 May 2019
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis is a piece of Creative Analytic Practice which uses auto/ethnographic storytelling to dis/orientate autism, childhood, and dis/ability. Dis/orientation is a theoretical tool I developed through, and with, the thesis borrowing from Critical Disability Studies’ dis/humanism and Ahmed’s orientation in queer phenomenology. Dis/humanism both desires the human and rejects it at the same time; the vital and giddy experience of dis/orientation is both to be drawn towards a comfortable orientation and at once to reject its seductive temptation as a final resting place or single terrain when encountering lives lived as ‘autistic’ and ‘child’. All orientations to autism, childhood and dis/ability are the effects of repeated and often concealed actions over time which I argue are temporary and changeable, given time and dis/orientating labour. Herein lies the hopeful call of dis/orientation throughout this thesis. Ethnographic fieldwork took place with children and families at home, school, nursery, public spaces and a muddy allotment over an 18 month period. Stories of the fieldwork are told as both method of inquiry and analytical tool. Three analysis chapters respond to my research questions exploring the ‘talking’, ‘being’ and ‘becoming’ of autism, childhood, and dis/ability. I argue that through talk, autism becomes rhizomatic in families' lives and is shaped by, and shaping of, collective identity work, emotional labour, and the neuro-governance of everyday life in neoliberal, commodified times. I argue that some orientations make some beings and becomings of childhood's labelled autistic more im/possible than others. Most significantly, I claim that a turn to embodiment outside of Cartesianism is valuable to theory, policy, practice and research in recognising the potential ‘becomings’ of disabled children’s childhoods in which they exceed subjectivation as ‘autistic’ or ‘child’ with and through their bodies in everyday life.
Supervisor: Goodley, Dan Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.694152  DOI: Not available
Share: