Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.694129
Title: Craft practice and resource perception in the Southern Urals during the Middle Bronze Age
Author: Pitman, Derek
ISNI:       0000 0004 5990 0871
Awarding Body: University of Sheffield
Current Institution: University of Sheffield
Date of Award: 2015
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 01 Jan 2021
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The thesis characterises metallurgical production at two Middle Bronze Age, Sintashta communities in the Southern Urals and presents a new model for the organisation of metal production in the region. Current models argue for intensive and centralised production that contributed to social complexity and the development of long-range exchange networks. Middle Bronze Age groups are characterised as complex warrior chiefdoms or even proto-states. The thesis examines these interpretations through the detailed characterisation of metallurgical debris. Particular attention is given to the identification of local practices at two Sintashta settlements and to characterising specific technological choices. An integrated methodology is employed, which incorporates fieldwork, an extensive study of metallurgical debris and a programme of experimental archaeology. The results demonstrate that the scale and organisation of primary copper metallurgy is greatly misrepresented in the published literature. While some aspects of production practice were shared among communities, specifically smelting technique, other aspects, such as the procurement of resources, were locally articulated. This has important implications for interpreting the organisation of Sintashta groups and their role in wider Eurasian society. The thesis argues that the persistent use of metallurgy as an indicator of complexity is inappropriate when craft practice is considered in its social context. The conclusion is that Middle Bronze Age communities in the Southern Urals were not complex hierarchies or proto-states that controlled production and access to resources. They were locally distinct groups that maintained a collective direction through a restriction and mediation of production practices.
Supervisor: Doonan, Roger Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.694129  DOI: Not available
Share: