Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Recontextualising the big society : from central imaginaries to local 'realities'
Author: Eyre, Laura
ISNI:       0000 0004 5914 8720
Awarding Body: Anglia Ruskin University
Current Institution: Anglia Ruskin University
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
The Big Society was conceived of in Conservative Party documents and speeches in 2009 and announced as a driving ambition of the new coalition government in May 2010. The Big Society represents an imagined future; a vision for change; an answer to the problem of ‘broken’ Britain. The idea has been criticised, its theoretical and ideological underpinnings have been widely examined, and its prospects for changing British society have been scrutinised. Despite all this there remains a need for research which explores the various ways in which ideas relating to the Big Society are defined, explained and put into practice, particularly at the level of local government. This is the contribution that my thesis seeks to make. My research is based on a simple premise; that the imagined Big Society at a central government level is potentially incompatible with the lived experience of society at a local level. Local government authorities, as the beneficiaries of decentralisation as power is supposedly passed to them from central government on its way to local communities and people, must be considered as influential mediators with significant causal powers. An integrated dialectical relational and discourse historical approach to Critical Discourse Analysis enables me to explore representations and recontextualisations of the Big Society during the development of localism – arguably a policy response to the Big Society - at Cambridgeshire County Council. I have developed an empirically based critique of the Big Society in its own terms at a local government level and conclude that the Big Society has failed to be realised in Cambridgeshire. I interpret this as being largely due to four key incompatibilities: (1) the ‘age of austerity’; (2) the unrealistic representations people and communities in the imagined Big Society; (3) the differences evident between the representation of local government in the imagined Big Society and the complexities of local government in Cambridgeshire; and (4) the unrealistic representation of local government freed from central government control.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available