Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.684439
Title: Hydropolitik, or, The love of abstraction : anthropologies of water reform in Central Asia
Author: Bater, Richard
ISNI:       0000 0004 5921 269X
Awarding Body: King's College London
Current Institution: King's College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
The project draws on ethnographic approaches to explore the practices in/through which modern water (see: Linton, 2010) is abstracted, naturalised, rendered governable, circulates as a political devise, and both constitutes and is constituted by a multiplicity of agencies that problematise the boundedness of the territorial, institutional, and embodied state normatively defined. The historical-geographical context Central Asia represents the focus of the project, as much as takes-up the question of precisely what it is to speak of Central Asia water (geo-)politics, and to what extent Soviet socio-technical regimes of water management continue to inflect upon present day water government, governance, and politics. Water is understood as an archetypical onto-political matter (Mol, 1999), in as much as it, in its modern singular rendering, represents a particular contested matter and set of discourses both at the basis of political contestation and shaped by it; and as matter in/through which (geo-)politics itself has been and continues to be at stake in extremely consequential ways. The project draws on rich empiricism in the empirical-conceptual space of Central Asia water (geo-)politics to extend engagements with scholars commonly (Bruno Latour), and less commonly (Antonio Gramsci, Hannah Arendt) brought to bare, by geographers, on questions of the spaces of politics and the political. In particular (following Ekers and Loftus (2009)), the research seeks to contribute to recent efforts by geographers to place Gramsci and Foucault into conversation with each other, and to ameliorate understandings of the ways in which their various theoretical insights may productively be used in parallel to enable richer understandings of government, the political, and space.
Supervisor: Mirumachi, Naho ; Loftus, Alexander John Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.684439  DOI: Not available
Share: