Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.676333
Title: Taking men as they are : an essay defending John Rawls' deference to "human nature" from the "concessionary criticism" of G.A. Cohen
Author: Ingham, Stuart
ISNI:       0000 0004 5372 7203
Awarding Body: University of Exeter
Current Institution: University of Exeter
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
G.A. Cohen argues that John Rawls' method of political philosophy--in particular his sensitivity to the facts of human nature--leads him inexorably to producing a nonideal conception of justice. In this thesis I defend Rawls against this accusation by demonstrating that the facts of human nature that he shows deference towards are a product of the "free development" of his ideal conception of the person. The result is that Rawls' conception of justice has the power and status that Rawls affords it, and that Cohen's critique fails to cause internal damage to Rawls' theory. My thesis is thus what the subtitle says it is: an essay in defence of John Rawls' deference to "human nature" from the "concessionary criticism" of G.A. Cohen.
Supervisor: Lamb, Robert ; Hampsher-Monk, Iain Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.676333  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Justice ; Rawls ; Cohen ; Equality ; Ideal Theory ; Political Philosophy ; Incentives
Share: