Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.665497
Title: Non-Participation in screening for cardiac conditions among adolescents: a systematic investigation of the decision-making
Author: Hirst , Mary Yasemin
ISNI:       0000 0004 5349 7583
Awarding Body: University of Surrey
Current Institution: University of Surrey
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Abstract:
Sudden cardiac death is the second biggest cause of death in the UK and at least 12 young people aged 14 to 35 die each week from undetected cardiac conditions. Cardiac screening, 12-led ECG test, has been speculated to have 90% effectiveness for illness detection. The UK National Screening Committee does not mandate population screening because there is not enough evidence for the cost-effectiveness and psychological costs to the individual. Yet, measuring the effectiveness of a screening relies on its participants. Literature to date offers some explanations for participation and non-participation; however, there is no literature for parents' decision-making processes for cardiac screening for adolescents aged 14-17. Therefore, this research has emerged from the need to understand the cognitive and affective processes that explain the decisions whether or not to take part in cardiac. screening. In pmiicular, Weinstein's (1988) Precaution Adoption Process Model (P APM) is used to identify of the stages of engagement for a non-apparent, a relatively unknown health risk, and investigated role of affect in decision-making. Initially, we explored retrospective accounts of non-pmiicipant families with a qualitative study and found that parents m·e primary decision-makers and organisations providing screening have a fundamental role for communicating credibility, task impOliance and salience under unceliainty. FUlihelIDore, we have explored decision-making with a concurrent think aloud study and found that "feelings-of-risk" provide a first step in engagement with health risk. Collectively, we assessed these findings with a prospective mixed methods study in which parents of adolescents were staged according to P APM. The results indicate that the respondents' trust and confidence in the organisation and the screening procedure provides the first steps from being unaware, unengaged and needing more information whilst "feelings-of-risk" is integral for deciding whether or not to have screening. The reasons for non-pmiicipation is characterised as being unfamiliar (unaware), having low trust in the processes of the organisation (unengaged), low decisional certainty (need info), low concern (not intend) and having practical baniers (non-pmiicipant intenders). The implications ofthe results are considered for theory, research and practice.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.665497  DOI: Not available
Share: