Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.663068
Title: Screening for benign prostatic hypertrophy
Author: Tsang, K. K.
Awarding Body: University of Edinburgh
Current Institution: University of Edinburgh
Date of Award: 1995
Availability of Full Text:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please contact the current institution’s library for further details.
Abstract:
Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is a very common disease among men aged 50 and its economic burden on health services continues to grow. The advocation for adopting new screening procedure for BPH begins to emerge. However, a new proposal for screening should be under careful scrutiny and ineffective and inappropriate screening must be avoided. A prospective cohort study has been launched to study the frequency, distribution, and natural history of BPH in two well-defined small communities in Central Scotland. Using the data from the cohort study, the hypothesis that a BPH screening programme justifies the stringent criteria set by Wilson and Jungner (1968) to evaluate any proposed programme, could be tested. The hypothesis has to be rejected after taking all the criteria into account. BPH was a major health problem among apparently well middle-age and elderly men in the community. It imposed significant interference in men's daily routine as well as influenced on their psychological general well-being. Although there was a detectable asymptomatic stage, the natural history of BPH from asymptomatic to a clinical stage was not clear. Because of the obscurity of the natural history, the optimum interval between repeated screens of a continuous screening process was unknown. The facilities for diagnosis and treatment could not be met by the present health services. The economic implications of a screening programme could be enormous, though a systemic analysis to evaluate the worthwhileness of the screening programme in economic terms was not conducted.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.663068  DOI: Not available
Share: