Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.655173
Title: Voice, choice, and governance : the case of Tanzania's Fairtrade coffee Co-operatives
Author: Sutton, Shannon
ISNI:       0000 0004 5362 9523
Awarding Body: Queen Mary, University of London
Current Institution: Queen Mary, University of London
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge about Fairtrade’s impact on producers by assessing voice and governance within producer organizations. I employ Fung and Wright’s (2003) framework of Empowered Participatory Governance (EPG) as a tool for understanding the challenges of collaborative governance as they relate to Fairtrade. EPG combines participation, decentralized decision-making, continuous deliberation and engagement, and co-operation between parties and interests, and as such is well suited to a consideration of Fairtrade governance. Through exploring EPG’s principles, design properties, and enabling conditions related to Fairtrade, I aim to learn more about whether or not this international system is truly achieving collaborative governance that enables individual producers to have a ‘stronger voice’. I consider Fung and Wright’s (2003) notion of countervailing power as a means of understanding how power structures may be challenged to the advantage of those who are typically marginalized within Fairtrade’s governance processes, and incorporate Hirschman’s (1970) work on exit, voice, and loyalty in order to explore alternatives to voice. This multiple case study focuses on Fairtrade coffee co-operatives in Tanzania. Over a period of two years, I conducted 139 individual interviews with key informants, managers, Board members, and producers in East Africa, held focus groups, and observed many events. Overall I found that Fairtrade creates opportunities for producer voice through its governance structures when (i) governance is collaborative and (ii) producers have substantial and equal access to capacity building. However, when individuals do not feel as though they have a voice, exit becomes a viable alternative.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Queen Mary, University of London ; Canadian Co-operative Association
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.655173  DOI: Not available
Share: