Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.654638
Title: Identification of breed contributions in crossbred dogs
Author: Doehring, Orlando
ISNI:       0000 0004 5359 1772
Awarding Body: University College London (University of London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2015
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 01 May 2018
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
There has been a strong public interest recently in the interrogation of canine ancestries using direct-toconsumer (DTC) genetic ancestry inference tools. Our goal is to improve the accuracy of the associated computational tools, by developing superior algorithms for identifying the breed composition of mixedbreed dogs. Genetic test data has been provided by Mars Veterinary, using SNP markers. We approach this ancestry inference problem from two main directions. The first approach is optimized for datasets composed of a small number of ancestry informative markers (AIM). Firstly, we compute haplotype frequencies from purebred ancestral panels which characterize genetic variation within breeds and are utilized to predict breed compositions. Due to a large number of possible breed combinations in admixed dogs we approximately sample this search space with a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. As proposal density we either uniformly sample new breeds for the lineage, or we bias the Markov Chain so that breeds in the lineage are more likely to be replaced by similar breeds. The second direction we explore is dominated by HMM approaches which view genotypes as realizations of latent variable sequences corresponding to breeds. In this approach an admixed canine sample is viewed as a linear combination of segments from dogs in the ancestral panel. Results were evaluated using two different performance measures. Firstly, we looked at a generalization of binary ROC-curves to multi-class classification problems. Secondly, to more accurately judge breed contribution approximations we computed the difference between expected and predicted breed contributions. Experimental results on a synthetic, admixed test dataset using AIMs showed that the MCMC approach successfully predicts breed proportions for a variety of lineage complexities. Furthermore, due to exploration in the MCMC algorithm true breed contributions are underestimated. The HMM approach performed less well which is presumably due to using less information of the dataset.
Supervisor: Balding, David J. Sponsor: Mars Symbioscience
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.654638  DOI: Not available
Share: