Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Doppler ultrasound measurement of arterial wall motion
Author: Dineley, J. A.
Awarding Body: University of Edinburgh
Current Institution: University of Edinburgh
Date of Award: 2007
Availability of Full Text:
Full text unavailable from EThOS.
Please contact the current institution’s library for further details.
Arterial Wall Motion (AWM) is of value in evaluating the elasticity of arteries, which is associated with the degree of focal and diffuse arteriosclerosis. A new technique derives AWM using integrated velocity data generated by Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) ultrasound. A preliminary in vivo reproducibility study in asymptomatic carotid arteries revealed high inter-measurement variability (Limits of agreement in TDI derived maximum dilation, Mx: 159μm) and several sources of variability. Accuracy assessment was performed in the laboratory with a device based upon a moving plate which mimicked physiological and sinusoidal motion and whose maximum displacement was know to within 3μm. Accuracy in Mx ranging from -3±8% to -23±1% for sinusoidal device motion, with amplitudes ranging from 248-1190 μm was obtained. Underestimation of Mx by the TDI/AWM software was found to systematically increase with increasing sinusoid amplitude and peak velocity. A compliant wall vascular flow phantom with mechanical and acoustic properties similar to tissue was designed for assessment of AWM technique precision. It consisted of a 6mm diameter uniformly elastic vessel of wall thickness 1.73 mm set in gelatin based tissue mimick. Two tissue mimick versions were devised: ‘A’ mimicked soft tissue attenuation for assessment of AWM precision, and ‘B’ maximised backscatter from the vessel. The latter was to optimise TDI/AWM technique performance during phantom characterisation measurements by maximising the signal received at the transducer. A range of realistic dilations and wall velocities were generated with pulsatile flow. AWM precision was found to vary with vessel depth (7±3%), beam-vessel angle (22±3%), scan plane-vessel coincidence (34±2%) and transducer pressure (20±3%).
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available