Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.647465
Title: Planning for flooding : a network governance perspective on flood risk management
Author: Bekker, Ellen
ISNI:       0000 0004 5367 0809
Awarding Body: University of Newcastle Upon Tyne
Current Institution: University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
In England, flooding in recent years has had a detrimental effect on the economy, the environment and the health and wellbeing of people. Climate change research suggests that the occurrence and consequences of flooding may worsen in the future. Therefore, effective flood risk management (FRM) is crucial. Traditionally, mainly structural measures, such as barriers and embankments, were taken to prevent flooding. In recent times, the emphasis has shifted to managing the risk of flooding by using non-structural methods as well, such as spatial planning. Simultaneously, there has been a shift from government to governance. Due to privatisation, agentification and decentralisation, decision making increasingly takes place in local governance networks. Actors with differing interests and responsibilities interact and negotiate in order to influence FRM, such as local authorities, the Environment Agency (EA), which has national responsibility for FRM, and developers. This PhD research explores the nature of network governance in FRM in England. The research focuses on local planning processes to examine the development and functioning of governance networks, in order to identify key factors that influence FRM. To achieve this, a multiple case study approach was applied, comprising two cases of local planning processes. The first case is a major mixed development in the North-East of England that has issues with river and surface water flooding, whilst the second case is a major redevelopment of a cricket ground in the South-East that is at significant risk of river flooding. The findings show that in both cases governance networks were formed to make decisions on FRM. In the first case, the actors cooperated and were able to implement a sustainable method of FRM. In the second case, the actors were unable to agree and the decision was referred to central government, which granted permission for development against the EA’s advice. One key factor influencing FRM was the actors’ ability to align interests, in particular the developers, the local authority and the EA, causing either conflict or cooperation in the governance network. The individual interests were derived from various factors, such as legislation, financial benefits and personal preference. The actors then used their agency to reach collaborative or individual objectives by utilising knowledge and structures to their advantage. Therefore, the nature of network governance influences the functioning of these networks, which in turn impacts on the way flood risk is managed.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.647465  DOI: Not available
Share: