Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.640988
Title: Opinion dynamics : from local interactions to global trends
Author: Woolcock, Anthony James Christopher
ISNI:       0000 0004 5349 8199
Awarding Body: University of Warwick
Current Institution: University of Warwick
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
We study the dynamics of consensus formation in a finite two-state voter model in which each agent has a confidence in their current opinion, k. The evolution of the distribution of k-values and the opinion change rules are coupled together to allow the opinion dynamics to dynamically develop heterogeneity of agent states in a simple way. We introduce two models. In both models pairs of agents with different opinions interact, which means k-values are compared and, with probability p, the agent with the lower value adopts the spin of the one with the higher value. In our nonconserved confidence model the agent with the higher k-value increments their confidence by one. In our conserved confidence model, additionally, the agent changing opinion reduces their k-value by one, so total confidence is conserved. The only parameter in both models is the probability p. We study the nonconserved model on the complete graph and compare the consensus time with the case p = 1/2 in which the opinion dynamics are decoupled from the k-values and are equivalent to standard voter model dynamics. When 1/2 < p < 1, agents with higher k{values are more persuasive and the consensus time is increased relative to the standard voter model although it still scales linearly with the number of agents, N. When p = 1, the consensus time scales as Nα with α = 1.4. When 0 < p < 1/2, agents with higher k-values are less persuasive and the consensus time is greatly decreased relative to the standard voter model and appears to be logarithmic in N. We provide some partial explanations for these observations using a mean-field model of the dynamics and a low-dimensional heuristic model which tracks only the sizes and mean k-values of each group. We also study the conserved model on the complete graph. When 1/2 < p < 1 this model also has consensus time that scales linearly with N and when p = 1 it scales as Nα with α = 1.4. However when 0 < p < 1/2 this conserved confidence model does not behave in the same way as the nonconserved model and the consensus time scales linearly with N. We compare the mean-field model dynamics with those of the nonconserved confidence model to partially explain model behaviour differences. We find consensus times for the nonconserved confidence model on low dimension regular lattices and compare with the complete graph. When 1/2 < p < 1, the consensus for the model on a 2d lattice is slower than the fully connected model, but in 3d results suggest that it is comparable. When p = 1, the population is prevented from reaching consensus by stable locally coordinated confidence arrangements. When 0 < p < 1/2, the consensus time is slow compared to the fully connected model and we notice spatial structures in the simulations. Also we implement a modification to the Axelrod model to introduce heterogeneity in the opinion space. We implement a bias in which opinions (features) are updated and separately a bias in the weight of influence of opinions on whether interaction occurs. Despite affecting the dynamics of the opinions and the time to absorbing state, we find the state, consensus or coexistence, the model typically reaches is robust under the effect of these two types of heterogeneity.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.640988  DOI: Not available
Keywords: QA Mathematics
Share: