Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.640037
Title: Distinguishing bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder : an exploration of clinical and neuroscience informed approaches
Author: Saunders, Katharine Eleanor Anne
ISNI:       0000 0004 5366 8549
Awarding Body: University of Oxford
Current Institution: University of Oxford
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder are common psychiatric diagnoses. One is a mood disorder with a strong genetic basis while the other is a disorder of personality commonly related to abusive experiences in childhood. Despite contrasting aetiologies they can be difficult to differentiate because of overlapping clinical presentations and symptoms. Diagnostic accuracy is important because of their polarised treatment approaches: long term treatment with mood stabilizers for bipolar disorder and psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. A qualitative study of psychiatrists revealed comprehensive knowledge of the diagnostic criteria however, many expressed the view that diagnostic criteria did not assist diagnostic differentiation. These findings were validated in a large electronic survey of UK psychiatrists. A detailed study of actual diagnostic processes revealed that this scepticism appeared to influence actual practice. Clinicians largely ignored diagnostic criteria but continued to give diagnoses. Age and IQ matched women with bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and a healthy control group were compared in a series of cognitive tasks. Borderline personality disorder was associated with a failure to establish and maintain reciprocal cooperation in a game theoretic measure of social exchange. This behavioural change was not seen in euthymic bipolar disorder. Borderline personality disorder was also associated with an insensitivity to reward and losses in a risky decision-making task. Using a simple two-choice reaction task post error slowing was significantly amplified in the borderline group despite overall reaction times and error rates being similar in all three groups. Clinical diagnostic practice as revealed in this study is not adequate to reliably differentiate between bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Laboratory measures of social exchange, decision making and post-error slowing highlight fundamental difficulties in borderline personality disorder not seen in euthymic bipolar disorder. These findings support the differentiation of bipolar disorder from borderline personality disorder and offer translational models for developing and evaluating new treatments for borderline personality disorder.
Supervisor: Goodwin, Guy Manning; Robert, Rogers Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.640037  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Bipolar disorder ; Psychiatry ; Cognitive Neuroscience ; Neuroscience ; borderline personality disorder
Share: