Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.639859
Title: Biomechanical analysis of fixed bearing and mobile bearing total knee prostheses
Author: Urwin, Samuel
ISNI:       0000 0004 5365 5844
Awarding Body: Northumbria University
Current Institution: Northumbria University
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
In total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, mobile bearing (MB) total knee prostheses were designed to more closely mimic the function of the normal knee than traditional fixed bearing (FB) designs by allowing axial mobility between the polyethylene insert and tibial tray. Despite the hypothetical benefits of the MB design, few studies have objectively analysed knee biomechanics during activities of daily living (ADLs) in the laboratory compared to FB designs. This thesis aimed to substantiate the theoretical advantages of MB implantation during ADLs in the laboratory as well as during free living conditions, in addition to investigating previous claims of instability in MB knees. Sixteen patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) surgery were randomised to receive either a FB (n=8) or MB (n=8) total knee prosthesis and were tested at pre-surgery, three months post-surgery, and nine months post-surgery using three dimensional motion analysis in the laboratory and electrogoniometry and accelerometry during free living conditions. No differences were found between FB and MB groups during walking at post-surgery that could not be explained by differences at pre-surgery. There were also no differences between FB and MB groups during the more biomechanically demanding activities of stair negotiation and sit to stand and stand to sit activities, as well as no differences during free living conditions away from the laboratory. There appears to be no evidence based rationale for the widespread use of MBs with regards to optimising knee function during ADLs. This thesis was the first to compare FB and MB designs using the same implant range, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) scenario, posterior stabilising strategy, and patella strategy over a range of ADLs, as well as being the first to combine testing in the laboratory with testing during free living conditions away from the laboratory.
Supervisor: Stewart, Su; Caplan, Nick; Kader, Deiary Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.639859  DOI: Not available
Keywords: B800 Medical Technology ; B900 Others in Subjects allied to Medicine
Share: