Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Debtor treatment themes in personal bankruptcy policy development from the early-modern period to the present day - plus ça change (plus c'est la même chose)
Author: Tribe, J. P.
Awarding Body: University College London (University of London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2012
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
This thesis is concerned with a critical evaluation of English personal insolvency laws. A thematic approach to debtor treatment is adopted as the central core of this work. The discussion focuses on a number of themes that are prevalent in insolvency law and policy, both in the modern context but also in a historical context. The purpose of this thesis is to show how these policy themes and debates are in no way novel throughout bankruptcy history - Plus ça change (plus c'est la même chose). The core themes chosen for elucidation in this thesis which feature recurrently in debtor treatment in a modern and historical context are: (1) Stigma; (2) Compositions & Moratoria; (3) Liberalisation & Amelioration; and finally, (4) Discharge. The acronym SCAMLAD encapsulates these core themes. It is against this moniker that divergent debtor treatment is tested in the early-modern period and the present day. In addition to the recurrent theme demonstration, two further theses are tested. First, it is argued that the treatment of insolvent debtors in the early-modern period was more liberal and foresightful than has hitherto been suggested (‘liberalisation thesis’). Secondly, it is argued that recent legislative changes engendered in the Enterprise Act 2002, in relation to discharge, have not caused additional redress to the bankruptcy procedure, but that the changes in the legislation were accompanied by an increase in consumer credit availability generally and that this led to a natural increase in debt related failure and therefore recourse to the bankruptcy laws (‘credit generosity thesis’).
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available