Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.620803
Title: 'An art that nature makes' : Wordsworth and the 'unachievable style', 1797-1805
Author: Clarkson, Oliver John
ISNI:       0000 0004 5359 2716
Awarding Body: Durham University
Current Institution: Durham University
Date of Award: 2014
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 25 Sep 2019
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
In his 1879 preface, Matthew Arnold made the flamboyant claim that Wordsworth’s best poetry ‘is as inevitable as Nature herself. It might seem that Nature not only gave him the matter for his poem, but wrote his poem for him. He has no style.’ Critics have commonly judged this proclamation either ludicrous or reductive. But this thesis argues that a comment such as this demands a different kind of attention, one which conceives of it not as abstract flummery but as diagnosing rather a fundamental impulse in Wordsworth’s poetry: the desire to absorb nature’s ‘own naked work / Self-wrought, unaided by the human mind’, to defy words, to relinquish ‘style’ itself in favour of a stylelessness that constitutes an ‘unachievable style’. According to the most dominant schools of criticism, Wordsworth’s ‘nature’ is either surmounted by the autonomous ‘Imagination’ (Hartman), elevated into an ahistorical and idealistic ‘Nature’ (McGann), or made a site of ecological worship (Bate). But I seize upon a question that cuts to the heart of what being a ‘Poet of Nature’ means: how can poetry apprehend a world that defies words? This thesis does not offer any easy answer to that question. It shows, rather, how Wordsworth’s poetry obstinately asks that question of itself, doing so with a sense of humility that recalls Thomson’s lines from The Seasons: ‘But who can paint / Like Nature? […] If fancy then / Unequal fails beneath the pleasing task, / Ah, what shall language do?’ My concern is with poetry whose ‘awareness of itself as poetry’ (O’Neill) serves to bring about a heightened appreciation of a world outside of poetry. This idea is pursued through seven chapters. Chapter I shows how Wordsworth’s ‘Poems on the Naming of Places’ put self-consciously on display language’s struggles to represent nature ‘inevitably’. Chapter II aligns issues of poetry and architecture by arguing that Wordsworth’s ‘ventriloquizing’ frees him to embark upon a stylistic journey from artifice towards naturalness. Chapter III considers the significance of mists and winds in 'Michael' as entities set in motion by verbs whose ‘indifference’ yields to what is untrackable in nature. In Chapter IV I show how shadows serve to analogise language’s imperfect relationship with nature in 'The Ruined Cottage'. My next chapter (VI) celebrates the formal artistry of Wordsworth’s 1802 lyrics, albeit an artistry wary of artistry. I delineate how, by enforcing and then unweaving their designs, the lyrics finally avow nature’s freedom. Chapter VI brings into focus what I term Wordsworth’s ‘anti-onomatopoeic’ technique, a technique whose achievement by way of negation epitomises Wordsworth’s modes of tribute to 'an art that nature makes'. My final chapter (VII) reads Wordsworth’s ‘Great Ode’ as a poem that laments, interrogates, and finally learns to live without a ‘forgotten style’ (a sort of pre-poetic absorption) that equates to the ‘unachievable style’.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.620803  DOI: Not available
Share: