Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.604347
Title: Responsibility interpretations and omission bias across the perinatal period & the relationship to obsessive-compulsive symptomatology
Author: Barrett, Roxanne
Awarding Body: University of London
Current Institution: Royal Holloway, University of London
Date of Award: 2013
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Abstract:
Objectives: To investigate how responsibility interpretations regarding intrusions vary across the perinatal period and how this relates to obsessive-compulsive symptomatology. Design: A mixed design was used investigating differences in responsibility interpretations and omission bias between three groups (antenatal, postnatal, and non-childbearing) for baby-related and non-baby situations. Method: 94 women (26 antenatal, 35 postnatal and 33 non-childbearing controls) completed measures of various aspects of responsibility including responsibility attitudes, interpretations regarding specific intrusions and omission bias, as well as obsessive-compulsive symptomatology, anxiety and depression.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Clin.Psychol.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.604347  DOI: Not available
Share: