Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.602753
Title: Performance, endorsements and tactical spending : electoral accountability of leaders and parties in Latin America
Author: De Ferrari, Ignazio
Awarding Body: London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London)
Current Institution: London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London)
Date of Award: 2013
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis investigates electoral accountability for incumbent leaders and their parties in Latin America. It addresses two central questions. First, it seeks to explain sources of contextual and institutional variation in the degree to which voters punish and reward incumbents. Second, it asks how voters hold incumbents accountable for other areas of government control besides the macro-economy. The first paper develops a framework of executive accountability as dependent on the degree to which the presidential candidate of the incumbent party is identified with the performance of the outgoing president. It differentiates between presidents running for re-election, successors, and non-successors. Estimating random-intercept random-slopes models on an original dataset, it shows different levels of accountability for the three types of candidates. The second paper examines whether endorsements from incumbent politicians to co-partisans lead to more electoral sanctioning. It uses a randomised experiment embedded in a national survey conducted in the run-up to the 2012Mexican general election to demonstrate that Senate candidates endorsed by the outgoing president are held more electorally accountable. Using a difference-in-difference design, the third paper finds causal evidence of tactical allocation of federal funds to municipalities governed by co-partisans of the president in the run-up to the 2006 Mexican presidential election. It shows that voters rewarded the party in the federal government for these additional transfers to their municipalities by voting for the ruling party. Taken together, the three papers have important theoretical implications for the study of electoral accountability, comparative electoral behaviour, and the quality of democracy in Latin America.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.602753  DOI: Not available
Keywords: JL Political institutions (America except United States)
Share: