Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.587825
Title: Caring at home for a family member with a terminal illness : a qualitative study of relatives' experiences
Author: Totman, J. W.
Awarding Body: University College London (University of London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2013
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Caring for a family member at the end of their life can be highly demanding, and those in this role are at increased risk of poor physical and mental health. Policy guidelines indicate that palliative care services have a key role to play in supporting family caregivers. This thesis explores the emotional challenges faced by relatives caring for a dying family member, and the ways in which healthcare professionals can support them. Part 1 is a literature review of psychological interventions for caregivers of terminally ill patients. A total of 23 studies were identified for inclusion, and interventions were classified into four types: problem-solving, psycho-educational/supportive, behavioural and bereavement/meaning-based. The majority of the studies reported positive outcomes, but the strength of their designs varied. Overall, the studies provide encouraging evidence for the benefits of psychological interventions in improving some aspects of caregivers’ wellbeing. Part 2 is a qualitative study exploring the emotional challenges faced by home caregivers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 recently bereaved relatives who had cared at home for a family member with cancer. Transcripts were analysed thematically using the Framework approach and themes were organised under four categories based on Yalom’s (1980) existentialist theoretical framework: responsibility, isolation, death and meaningfulness. Part 3 is a reflective discussion of the process of carrying out the empirical study and the literature review. The limitations of both projects are considered, as well as some of the broader conceptual, methodological, clinical and contextual issues arising from them.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.587825  DOI: Not available
Share: