Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.583375
Title: Area effects on health inequalities: the impact of neighbourhood deprivation on mortality and morbidity
Author: Zhang, Xin
Awarding Body: University of Liverpool
Current Institution: University of Liverpool
Date of Award: 2012
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Abstract:
There is a long history of research showing that material deprivation indicators are important predictors of health inequalities. The gap between the richest and poorest members of society is more predictive' of ill-health than the deprivation per se in countries that are above a certain income threshold level. However, although . . . , demonstrated across nations and states, the exact nature of the association between the context of the local area and local health outcomes is unclear. The aim of this thesis is to examine area effects on health inequalities. It explores whether the socioeconomic conditions of neighbouring localities influence the mortality and self-reported morbidity of a target locality, analysing at different levels of small geographical units across the whole of England. It tests the hypothesis that areas which are geographically close, but divergent in terms of deprivation, have different health outcomes than those where deprivation is similar across neighbouring localities. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) was used to create a neighbouring deprivation index (Adjacent Locality Deprivation-ALD) using a gravity model. Principal component analysis was then applied to disaggregate the strong correlation between the deprivation of a target area (lMD) and that of its surrounding areas (ALD). At lower super output area (LSOA) level (n=32,482, population size approximately 1,500 persons), the first principal component (PC1) represents the common effect of IMD and ALD. The second principal component (PC2) represents the additional effect due to the difference between IMD and ALD, which is interpreted as relative deprivation. However, at middle super output area (MSOA) level (n=6,780, population 7,500), IMD and ALD are already orthogonal, with the PCl being the equivalent of IMD and PC2 being ALD. Linear regression models were applied to scrutinize the association between the two principal component scores (predictors) and Directly Standardised Rate (DSR) mortality, self-reported morbidity (outcome variables), identifying the strength of the relative effect of the two principal component scores on health in different segments of the population. At LSOA level, areas that were deprived compared to their immediate neighbours . , . , suffered higher rates of mortality (~=0.162, p
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.583375  DOI: Not available
Share: