Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580371
Title: Challenges and dilemmas in integrating human rights-based approaches and participatory approaches to development : an exploration of the experiences of ActionAid International
Author: Newman, Kate
Awarding Body: Goldsmiths, University of London
Current Institution: Goldsmiths College (University of London)
Date of Award: 2011
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
Participation and rights fit together, right? The right to participate is a universal human right. Participation, accountability and inclusion are central principles underlying the universal declaration of human rights, and taking a human rights-­‐based approach to development means that ‘beneficiaries’ become active participants in their development process. But how do these two approaches to development actually interact with each other in practice? What happens when a bottom-­‐up approach to development is brought together with a universal concept of human rights? What are the trade-offs an INGO committed to participation would need to make in order to engage in rights-based practice? This thesis is based on an 'extreme' case, the education work of ActionAid International. ActionAid is an INGO committed to transforming power relations at every level, to strengthening Southern participation in shaping and defining development, and to taking a human rights-based approach to poverty eradication and development. Over the past ten years, ActionAid has been undergoing a process of organisational transformation and decentralisation in order to create the organisational form to pursue its rights-based vision. In doing this, it built on over 30 years experience of local community development and participatory practice. The organisation worked to integrate its rights-based approach with strongly rooted participatory development, but the process was complex. Translating theory into practice was influenced by organisational history, structure and culture, and the diversity of understandings of what a rights-based approach actually consists of. This thesis draws from an analysis of ActionAid’s practice to argue that rather than complementing and extending each other, rights and participation actually exist in tension. My findings suggest that the two approaches pull the organisation in opposite directions, and that this needs to be acknowledged and worked with if INGOs are to pursue a radical transformative approach to development.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.580371  DOI: Not available
Share: