Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580081
Title: Making sense of smell : classifications and model thinking in olfaction theory
Author: Barwich, Ann-Sophie
Awarding Body: University of Exeter
Current Institution: University of Exeter
Date of Award: 2013
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis addresses key issues of scientific realism in the philosophy of biology and chemistry through investigation of an underexplored research domain: olfaction theory, or the science of smell. It also provides the first systematic overview of the development of olfactory practices and research into the molecular basis of odours across the 19th and 20th century. Historical and contemporary explanations and modelling techniques for understanding the material basis of odours are analysed with a specific focus on the entrenchment of technological process, research tradition and the definitions of materiality for understanding scientific advancement. The thesis seeks to make sense of the explanatory and problem solving strategies, different ways of reasoning and the construction of facts by drawing attention to the role and application of scientific representations in olfactory practices. Scientific representations such as models, classifications, maps, diagrams, lists etc. serve a variety of purposes that range from the stipulation of relevant properties and correlations of the research materials and the systematic formation of research questions, to the design of experiments that explore or test particular hypotheses. By examining a variety of modelling strategies in olfactory research, I elaborate on how I understand the relation between representations and the world and why this relation requires a pluralist perspective on scientific models, methods and practices. Through this work I will show how a plurality of representations does not pose a problem for realism about scientific entities and their theoretical contexts but, on the contrary, that this plurality serves as the most reliable grounding for a realistic interpretation of scientific representations of the world and the entities it contains. The thesis concludes that scientific judgement has to be understood through its disciplinary trajectory, and that scientific pluralism is a direct consequence of the historicity of scientific development.
Supervisor: Dupre, John; Hauskeller, Michael Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.580081  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Olfaction ; Philosophy of Science ; History of Science ; Philosophy of Biology ; History of Biology ; Scientific Realism ; Pluralism ; Classification ; Philosophy of Chemistry ; History of Chemistry ; Representation ; Models ; Modelling ; Fiction ; Reference ; Natural Kinds ; Natural Kind Terms ; mechanism ; Molecular Biology ; Fragrance Chemistry ; Evidence ; Theory Choice ; Model Choice ; Scientific Judgement ; Epistemic History ; Odour ; Smell ; Molecular basis of odours ; mechanism of primary odour recognition ; ligand binding process ; G coupled protein receptors
Share: