Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.571266
Title: Top court reform in the United Kingdom and New Zealand 1999-2011 : a participant perspective and critique
Author: Cornes, Richard
Awarding Body: University of Essex
Current Institution: University of Essex
Date of Award: 2011
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Abstract:
The nine pieces that comprise this submission for a doctorate of philosophy in law are concerned with the reform debates in the United Kingdom and New Zealand between 1999 and 2011, and which led during that period to both countries establishing new Supreme Courts. My interest in top court reform in both countries has not been though simply as an academic commentator: three of the pieces were prepared to engage directly with the policy debates concerned: a briefing to a Royal Commission on Reform of the House of Lords covering the role of the Law Lords; an options study of possible reform models co-authored with Andrew Le Sueur and funded by the ESRC; and a submission to the UK Parliament on the Constitutional Reform Bill. My concern has been, and continues to be, to offer the insights of academic study to ongoing reform debates, and also to bring into my academic writing a sense of the realities which may flow from engaging with the policy making process. To give a sense of ongoing perspective I also outline in a closing chapter my current and possible future research projects, all of which continue in the theme of top court studies in the United Kingdom and New Zealand.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.571266  DOI: Not available
Share: