Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.570544
Title: Epistemic theories of democracy, constitutionalism and the procedural legitimacy of fundamental rights
Author: Allard-Tremblay, Yann
Awarding Body: University of St Andrews
Current Institution: University of St Andrews
Date of Award: 2012
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The overall aim of this thesis is to assess the legitimacy of constitutional laws and bills of rights within the framework of procedural epistemic democracy. The thesis is divided into three sections. In the first section, I discuss the relevance of an epistemic argument for democracy under the circumstances of politics: I provide an account of reasonable disagreement and explain how usual approaches to the authority of decision-making procedures fail to take it seriously. In the second part of the thesis, I provide an account of the epistemic features of democracy and of the requirements of democratic legitimacy. I develop a revised pragmatist argument for democracy which relies on three presumptive aims of decision-making: justice, sustainability and concord. In the third and last section, I first argue for the desirability of constitutionalism. I then explain why constitutionalism, as it is usually understood, is incompatible with my procedural epistemic account of democratic legitimacy. In the last chapter, I offer a two-pronged solution to the apparent incompatibility of constitutionalism and epistemic democracy. I first argue for the appropriateness of political constitutionalism, as opposed to legal constitutionalism, in understanding the relationship between rights and democracy. I then provide an account of rights protection and judicial review compatible with epistemic democratic legitimacy. Finally, I use the notion of pragmatic encroachment to explain how constitutional laws can achieve normative supremacy through the increased epistemic credentials of the procedure.
Supervisor: Cruft, Rowan; Mulgan, Tim Sponsor: Fonds Québécois de Recherche sur la Société et la Culture ; St Andrews and Stirling Joint Programme in Philosophy
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.570544  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Epistemic democracy ; Constitutionalism ; Legitimacy ; Rights ; JC423.A66 ; Democracy--Philosophy ; Epistemics ; Constitutional law--Philosophy ; Legitimacy of governments--Philosophy
Share: