Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: The decision rule approach to optimisation under uncertainty : theory and applications
Author: Georghiou, Angelos
Awarding Body: Imperial College London
Current Institution: Imperial College London
Date of Award: 2013
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access through Institution:
Optimisation under uncertainty has a long and distinguished history in operations research. Decision-makers realised early on that the failure to account for uncertainty in optimisation problems can lead to substantial unexpected losses or even infeasible solutions. Therefore, approximating the uncertain parameters by their average or nominal values may result in decisions that perform poorly in scenarios that deviate from the average. For the last sixty years, scenario tree-based stochastic programming has been the method of choice for solving optimisation problems affected by parameter uncertainty. This method approximates the random problem parameters by finite scenarios that can be arranged as a tree. Unfortunately, this approximation suffers from a curse of dimensionality: the tree needs to branch whenever new uncertainties are revealed, and thus its size grows exponentially with the number of decision stages. It has recently been argued that stochastic programs can quite generally be made tractable by restricting the space of recourse decisions to those that exhibit a linear data dependence. An attractive feature of this linear decision rule approximation is that it typically leads to polynomial-time solution schemes. Unfortunately, the simple structure of linear decision rules sacrifices optimality in return for scalability. The worst-case performance of linear decision rules is in fact rather disappointing. When applied to two-stage robust optimisation problems with m linear constraints, the underlying worst-case approximation ratio has been shown to be of the order O(√m). Therefore, in this thesis we endeavour to construct efficiently computable instance-wise bounds on the loss of optimality incurred by the linear decision rule approximation. The contributions of this thesis are as follows. (i)We develop an efficient algorithm for assessing the loss of optimality incurred by the linear decision rule approximation. The key idea is to apply the linear decision rule restriction not only to the primal but also to a dual version of the stochastic program. Since both problems share a similar structure, both problems can be solved in polynomial-time. The gap between their optimal values estimates the loss of optimality incurred by the linear decision rule approximation. (ii) We design an improved approximation based on non-linear decision rules, which can be useful if the optimality gap of the linear decision rules is deemed unacceptably high. The idea takes advantage of the fact that one can always map a linearly parameterised non-linear function into a higher dimensional space, where it can be represented as a linear function. This allows us to utilise the machinery developed for linear decision rules to produce superior quality approximations that can be obtained in polynomial time. (iii) We assess the performance of the approximations developed in two operations management problems: a production planning problem and a supply chain design problem. We show that near-optimal solutions can be found in problem instances with many stages and random parameters. We additionally compare the quality of the decision rule approximation with classical approximation techniques. (iv) We develop a systematic approach to reformulate multi-stage stochastic programs with a large (possibly infinite) number of stages as static robust optimisation problem that can be solved with a constraint sampling technique. The method is motivated via an investment planning problem in the electricity industry.
Supervisor: Rustem, Berc ; Kuhn, Daniel Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available