Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.560653
Title: The diversity of sequence alignment and tree space at high parameter density
Author: Borrow, Christopher Andrew
Awarding Body: Imperial College London
Current Institution: Imperial College London
Date of Award: 2012
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
When attempting to characterise communities by their phylogenetic diversity, Scarabaeinae provide an ideal model system. Historically three genes, cox1, 28S and 16S, have been widely used in phylogenetic studies for members of the Coleoptera and this is also the case for the Scarabaeinae. Two of these genes, 28S and 16S, are length variable. The alignment of nucleotide sequence data containing multiple insertion and deletion events is a notoriously difficult problem to resolve. Accurately doing so is important, as the accuracy of the alignment is thought to play a crucial role in determining phylogenetic tree topology. Therefore it is necessary to find a way to accurately align the sequence data before communities can be accurately characterised across a hypothesised phylogenetic tree. Little guidance is available on how the users of alignment programs should go about this task. In the following chapters an understanding of how alignment parameters act on the alignment of 16S data from Coleoptera species is reported along with a method for using members of the Clustal program family. The use of two scoring systems for judging the quality of alignments is also explored. Selecting alignments based on minimising overall alignment diversity appears to minimise synapomorphy and homoplasy, while maximising taxonomic consistency. Therefore, using the Shannon- Wiener or Simpsons Index of diversity to score alignment quality may prove useful to phylogeneticists.
Supervisor: Krell, F. ; Vogler, Alfried Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.560653  DOI: Not available
Share: