Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.537770
Title: Sound quality evaluations using interactive simulation : innovation report
Author: Giudice, Sebastiano D.
Awarding Body: University of Warwick
Current Institution: University of Warwick
Date of Award: 2009
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Sound Quality engineering (SQE) is a discipline that should be embedded within Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH) engineering. Its purpose is to tailor and enhance a vehicle’s sound in order for it to meet and / or exceed the customers’ expectations of the car and of the brand. NVH engineers need to use the opinions of customers, key decision makers in the organisation and those of their colleagues to set objective NVH targets for new vehicles. Their opinions are captured through jury evaluations. Interactive simulation is a new approach to presenting sounds to a jury. It enables assessors to evaluate existing and concept cars generated in real time and before the manufacture of physical prototypes. This document summarises the research carried out for the EngD research programme. Its aim was to develop methodological approaches for setting up evaluations using interactive simulation, optimise its data capture and analysis capabilities and provide insight, to NVH engineers, into how assessors evaluate sound quality. The first stage of the research involved benchmarking how the interactive simulation tool was being used by its developers, and how NVH targets are set within an OEM. This provided the foundation upon which to build the new methodology. The benchmark was compared against methodological approaches used in experimental psychology and in other sensory perception practices. This identified that principles for the design of evaluations had not been considered and appropriate statistical analysis techniques were not being implemented. Therefore it was not possible to ensure if the differences observed in the results were significant or not. It also became apparent that as each assessor was free to drive vehicles however they wished, the NVH engineers would not be able to link the assessor’s subjective impressions with the acoustical stimuli used to form an opinion. This was due to the lack of observational methods that could be applied. In addition, the use of this form of interactivity was novel compared to the approaches available before the introduction of the simulation. Therefore it was not yet understood how it could influence the outcome of the evaluations. An iterative approach was adopted to develop both tools and methods. Following the benchmarking stages, experimental design principles were implemented and a structured briefing method was formulated for the first time. These contributed to the overall methodologies and were also used to ensure the studies conducted as part of this research programme were free from experimental biases. This stage was followed by identifying a statistical analysis framework which can be used to study the assessors’ subjective impressions. These contributions enable the NVH engineer to understand if the differences observed between sounds are significant or not. The next phase was to understand how to best capture subjective opinions. Recommendations for this were based on the purpose of the evaluation. For the benchmarking stages of the NVH target setting process, many cars are often evaluated and therefore the duration of the evaluation can be a concern. However, the desired level of accuracy of the results is not as high as it is for the validations stages, upon which key engineering decisions are based, and also fewer cars are evaluated. Taken together it was possible to recommend the use of scaled interfaces for the benchmarking stages and the paired comparison method for the validation stages. The former takes less time to complete than the latter, which is however more accurate. The data capture capabilities were further enhanced through the development of a driver observation module; this enabled the assessor’s assessment strategies to be recorded. The data collected provided insight into how assessors drove with the aid of new visualisation and analysis techniques developed. Given the availability of these new methods and tools it was then possible to use the simulator to observe the influence of interactivity on the outcome of the evaluation. This demonstrated that assessment strategies can vary depending on the question asked to the assessor. The study indicated that assessors associated the refinement character of a car with driving conditions other than those presented to them in traditional evaluations. Through the research and developments of this EngD programme, NVH engineers can now observe with confidence if differences between sounds are significant and they can see and hear how the assessor made decisions. Therefore they can now link subjective impressions formed with the stimuli evaluated by the assessor, hence an effective way of using the simulator has been proposed.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Eng.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.537770  DOI: Not available
Keywords: HF Commerce ; TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
Share: