Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.535497
Title: The legacy of Cornelius Cardew
Author: Harris, Antony
ISNI:       0000 0003 8212 341X
Awarding Body: Birmingham City University
Current Institution: Birmingham City University
Date of Award: 2011
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Abstract:
Any direction modern music will take in England will come about only through Cardew, because of him, by way of him. If the new ideas in music are felt today as a movement in England, it's because he acts as a moral force, a moral centre. Feldman, 1967: 43 These words, uttered by Morton Feldman in 1967, are often cited in the literature surrounding Cornelius Cardew but their veracity is rarely discussed. The extent to which Cardew has been a central figure and force for new ideas in music forms the backbone to this thesis. This thesis attempts to identify and define a 'Cardew aesthetic': a framework of underpinning principles and values that inform an approach and attitude towards music making. This is achieved through an exploration of Cardew's work, starting with his formative experiences with Stockhausen, the European traditions and his growing sympathies with John Cage and the American experimentalists. The thesis discusses Cardew's developing ideological awareness informed by his work with the Scratch Orchestra, and his ultimate rejection of the avant-garde and experimentalism, and his commitment to Marxism. The thesis identifies the significant threads and traits apparent across this diverse body of work. It argues that they represent a new way of approaching musical activity, and that this is the legacy of Cornelius Cardew. The thesis then discusses the extent to which this legacy has influenced and informed a range of individuals and groups within a range of contexts. The thesis concludes by suggesting that Cardew was not only a central character in the development of 'new ideas' in the 1960s and 70s but that the Cardew legacy continues to inform practice and thinking, and continues to act as the moral force and centre of which Feldman speaks.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.535497  DOI: Not available
Share: