Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.525874
Title: The evaluation of power plant investments in the Korean electricity industry
Author: Yun, Taesik
Awarding Body: University of Salford
Current Institution: University of Salford
Date of Award: 2010
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The purpose of this thesis is to use real option methodologies to assess capital investment decisions of near future projects that will be made in Korea. I compare two base load plants burning different fuels such as coal and uranium within the CO2 allowance trading context to provide prominence to a nuclear power plant. Nuclear power plants have recently been rising to the surface as one of the leading alternatives to the generation plants using fossil fuels. To consider the flexibilities and uncertainties in a competitive market environment, I employed the real options approach, due to its superiority in dealing with uncertainties and incorporating management's flexibilities into the valuation process. Furthermore, I tried to evaluate the investment opportunity contingent on at least two underlying assets featuring different price evolution behaviours. As main pricing skeletons, I adopted the mean reversion model for the evolution of electricity prices and the gBm model for that of the COi allowance prices and construction costs of a nuclear power plant. In addition, I used the Monte Carlo simulation approach as the approximation tool to overcome a limitation of the analytic approach. Our findings confirmed that the real options approach uncovered hidden strategic value and provided critical insights to the investment decision making process. Keywords: Investment Analysis, Real Option Approach, Base Load Plant, CO2 Allowance, Electricity Price
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.525874  DOI: Not available
Share: