Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.517644
Title: Re-thinking and re-scaling science?
Author: Perry, Beth Gemma
ISNI:       0000 0001 2427 8443
Awarding Body: University of Salford
Current Institution: University of Salford
Date of Award: 2009
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
This Ph.D. by Published Works examines the dynamic interaction between a re-thinking and a re-scaling of science. The ten Published Works are located at the intersection between debates on the changing governance of science and science policy governance in the context of a multi-scalar knowledge-based economy. Three critical themes are examined relating to the relationship between excellence and relevance, the roles of universities in knowledge-based coalitions and the relative significance of regional and local knowledge-based developments for science policy governance. The empirical emphasis is on two case studies of regional and local science policies in North West England between 2002 and 2008, in international comparative context. The Published Works collectively construct a powerful story-line of change and continuity within contemporary developments, undermining claims that a paradigm shift has occurred in either the re-thinking or re-scaling of science. Disembedded understandings of excellence predominate, despite the articulation of alternative discourses on the roles of different knowledges for sub-national socioeconomic development. Universities occupy ambiguous roles, with some better able than others to mobilise institutional power to provide relative shelter from external pressures. Sub-national interventions emphasise the re-development of physical spaces and are acquisition-oriented, rather than predicated upon shifts in modes of knowledge production. A critical contribution of the Published Works is the forging of an interdisciplinary agenda around re-thinking and re-scaling science that is both academically excellent and policy relevant. The Ph.D. illustrates the need for more integrated theoretical and practical understandings of the relationship between the governance of science and of science policy governance and both defines and seeks to populate critical gaps in this agenda.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.517644  DOI: Not available
Share: