Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.501353
Title: Mood states, cognitive characteristics and accuracy of confidence assessments : testing the validity of the depressive realism vs. the negativity hypothesis
Author: Fu, Tiffany Szu-Ting
Awarding Body: The University of Reading
Current Institution: University of Reading
Date of Award: 2008
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Abstract:
This study tested the validity of the depressive realism versus the negativity hypotheses by investigating the relation between confidence and accuracy in clinically depressed, dysphoric and control participants when performing decision tasks. In Experiment 1, depressed and dysphoric recovered depressed patients showed systematic PTPE underconfidence across several tasks regardless of performance accuracy but displayed item-by-item overconfidence equivalent to that of controls on tests of general knowledge and object recognition. In Experiment 2, control participants demonstrated both item-by-item overconfidence and PTPE underconfidence on a newly developed self-relevant adjective recognition task, thus enabling a stronger contrasting test of the two hypotheses in subsequent experiments.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.501353  DOI: Not available
Share: