Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.500219
Title: Assessing morbidity associated with standard transurethral resection of the prostate : a comparison between 1.5% glycine and 5% glucose irrigation during TURP
Author: Collins, J. W.
Awarding Body: University of Bristol
Current Institution: University of Bristol
Date of Award: 2007
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Abstract:
Despite the known complications of transurethral prostatectomy TURP remains the gold standard for benign prostatic hypertrophy causing bladder outflow obstruction. Standard TURP may predispose a patient to increased morbidity and mortality by several mechanisms including irrigating fluid absorption and blood loss as well as the standard risks from operating on an aged population. There is increasing evidence in the literature to support the hypotheses that glycine irrigation when absorbed is both cardiotoxic and neurotoxic. This prompted me to investigate whether two different irrigant fluids differ in terms of harmful effects and whether these differences can be measured in the perioperative period.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.500219  DOI: Not available
Share: