Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.494852
Title: Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis
Author: Clohessy, Sue
ISNI:       0000 0001 3559 170X
Awarding Body: University of Hull
Current Institution: University of Hull
Date of Award: 2008
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
This study aims to explore supervisors' perspectives of their supervisory relationships (SRs) with trainee clinical psychologists, particularly the ways in which they enhance these relationships, and identify and resolve problems.A retrospective qualitative design was used, and clinical psychologists with experience of a range of SRs with trainees participated in the study. Method: Twelve supervisors completed a semi-structured interview about their effective and ineffective SRs with trainees. The data was analysed using Grounded Theory.Three core categories were highlighted regarding the quality of the SR's contextual influences, the flow of supervision and core relational factors. Contextual influences, which influenced the development of the SR included the team or service context, the training course and individual factors the supervisor and trainee contribute to the relationship. The flow of supervision incorporated the supervisor's investment in the SR and the trainee's openness to learning. The core relational factors of the SR incorporated interpersonal connection, emotional tone and the degree of openness, honesty, safety and trust. The findings suggested a reciprocal relationship between the core relational factors, the supervisor's investment in the SR, and the trainee's openness to learning. Strains in the SR can occur in any of the three categories, and the findings suggest that the supervisor's investment in the SR and the trainee's openness to learning improve the chances of problems being resolved. A resolution cycle was highlighted which incorporated noticing the problem, gathering information, formulating and intervening.The findings are discussed in relation to relevant theory and research. The implications for future research, theory and training are highlighted.
Supervisor: Beinart, Helen Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Psy.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.494852  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Psychology
Share: