Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.494786
Title: Combat personnel : the effects of material, politics, management, and attributes on their capabilities and performance
Author: Newsome, Bruce
Awarding Body: The University of Reading
Current Institution: University of Reading
Date of Award: 2007
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Abstract:
Why do the combat capabilities and performance of combat personnel vary? There are four main explanations, each respectively asserting the influence of: material endowments; domestic politics; personnel management; and personnel attributes. First, theories of international relations, military power, military capability, and military technology imply that capabilities and performance reflect material endowments, but contradictorily imply that militaries compensate for inferior material endowments by emphasizing combat personnel. Second, some democratic victory theories claim that democracies produce better commanders, superior strategies, more motivated personnel, or better-managed personnel.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.494786  DOI: Not available
Share: