Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.494287
Title: Semantic memory impairments in schizophrenia : a neuropsychological study to evaluate competing theories
Author: Doughty, Olivia
ISNI:       0000 0001 3430 1096
Awarding Body: University of Hertfordshire
Current Institution: University of Hertfordshire
Date of Award: 2008
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
People with a diagnosis of schizophrenia have been found to perform poorly on tasks assessing semantic memory, and these impairments have been proposed to be related to certain symptoms, in particular Formal Thought Disorder (FTD). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis identified the need a) to determine whether semantic memory is a primary impairment in schizophrenia and not secondary to other cognitive impairments and b) what cognitive models could provide the best explanation for the impairment. With these aims, Studies One and Two compared the performance of a group of people with schizophrenia across a battery of semantic memory tests (Hodges, Salmon and Butters, 1992). In order to eliminate confounding variables, two clinical control groups were recruited for comparison, one with a probable degraded semantic memory arising from Alzheimer‘s Dementia (AD) and the other with a primary dysexecutive syndrome caused by acquired brain injury (ABI). From these comparisons, it was possible to profile the semantic memory impairment in schizophrenia with the conclusion that any deficits are task-specific. Unlike the AD group, the impairment did not seem to arise from a loss of stored knowledge but nor did a retrieval problem, in its simplest terms, offer the best explanation. Since the ABI group performed normally on the battery it is clear that a dysexecutive syndrome does not necessarily explain poor semantic memory performance. Qualitatively, the associations and categories formed by people with schizophrenia on tasks of semantic categorisation e.g. the Category Generation Test (CGT) (Green, Done, Anthony, McKenna and Ochocki, 2004) often resemble loosening of associations and psychotic speech. In order to understand more about the processes involved in the formation of these bizarre categories, I compared performance on the CGT of groups of people with schizophrenia, AD and ABI. I found that the people with AD performed fairly similarly to the people with schizophrenia in that they sorted cards in an idiosyncratic way but the ABI group performed normally, adhering to taxonomic categories. Although this result might suggest that the bizarre associations on the CGT in people with schizophrenia are caused by a deficit in semantic memory (and not a dysexecutive syndrome), further analysis found important differences between the AD and the schizophrenia group in the way the card sorts were formed. In addition, both these groups showed intact semantic memory knowledge of the items they mis-sorted, indicating that categorisation problems do not necessarily arise from a degraded memory store. The difficulties people with schizophrenia appear to have on tests of associations and categorisation (e.g. CGT) could arise from a disorganised semantic memory i.e. differences in the way in which concepts are interconnected. On the CGT, patients with schizophrenia were far more likely to sort items on the basis of thematic (situational) information suggesting a preference for thematic over taxonomic associations. To test this, participants were tested using a triadic comparison task which requires choosing whether an item is best associated with a taxonomic, thematic or perceptually related item. On this test patients performed comparably to controls suggesting that their semantic memory is organised normally and that the abnormalities in the way in which items are associated on some semantic memory tests, including the CGT, are task-specific. It has been proposed that one of the core problems in schizophrenia is that there is ―an aberrant assignment of salience‖ (Kapur 2003) to contextually inappropriate concepts due to a dysregulated dopamine system (Kapur 2003; Kapur et al 2005). It is possible that this could also explain the semantic memory impairments in schizophrenia i.e. certain less relevant concepts/ associations are chosen because they are experienced as more salient. To test this, a group of patients with schizophrenia were assessed using a test of semantic salience. Compared to controls, the patients made significantly more errors of salience including significantly more errors where large aberrant attributions of importance were given to items. The tendency to make errors on the salience test was highly correlated with errors on the CGT and also the semantic association tests, indicating a common underlying mechanism. Therefore, it can be concluded that the semantic memory impairments in schizophrenia are task-specific, not caused by a loss of semantic knowledge or a dysexecutive syndrome, but due to an aberrant assignment of salience to less relevant semantic concepts. More work is needed to understand the cognitive processes underlying this aberrant attribution process, and also the biological substrates involved.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.494287  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Schizophrenia ; Semantic Memory ; Neuropsychology ; Alzheimer’s Dementia ; Overinclusion ; Categorisation ; Cognition ; Acquired Brain Injury ; Salience ; Psychosis ; Spreading Activation ; Meta-Analysis
Share: