Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.487561
Title: Social-ecological resilience and the institutions in protected areas: A case study of three Villages at Bardia National Park, Nepal
Author: Thapa, Shova
Awarding Body: University of Sussex
Current Institution: University of Sussex
Date of Award: 2007
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Abstract:
Resource exploitation by human communhies living in close proximity to protected areas has motivated the imposition of strict rules and regulations for biodiversity conservation and management. However, these rules have often been shown to exacerbat~ illegal ~esource extraction and resource use conflicts. While the role of the park-people conflict in the degradation of protected areas has been discussed, such a relationship has rarely been ~xplored empirically through a wider perspective of coupled human and natural systems and institutions. as a mediator betw~en them. Thus, this study investigates the role of institutions in providing social-ecological resilience in three villages near Nepal's Bardia National Park (BNP). A standardized household questionnaire, workshops, interviews, focus groups and v~getation surveys were conducted to generate data on the institutional arrangementS in BNP anct't\Yo key outcomes of the social-ecological systems, namely community livelihoods and the Slate of the park's vegetation. Narrative analysis, binomial regression, t-tests, non-parametric tests and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. The findings suggested that more than a third of the respondents met their livelihoo~ needs by illegally and regularly extracting resources from the park, which had significant impact on the vegetation diversity and structure. Wildlife interference and strict rules restricting resource use were the main causes of conflict .between communities'and park management. As uniform rules were applied for ali cases and all levels of social groups, incentives were found to be ineffective in meeting community needs. Lack of community' involvement in the design of incentive structures, low level of local participation in decision making processes, and non-consideration of local people's needs while making management' plans were responsible for these institutional failures. These findings suggest that 'site-specific management strategies, tog~ther with nested and overlapping institutions, are crucial for the design of robust institutions. A new paradigm that integrates adaptive co-learning and management techniques is essential for the co-existence of humans and wildlife at Bardia.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.487561  DOI: Not available
Share: