Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.478167
Title: On the comparison of protection systems
Author: Wyeth, David
Awarding Body: Newcastle University
Current Institution: University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Date of Award: 1976
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
A methodology is presented for performing quantitative cost-benefit comparisons of protection systems. Protection systems in both programming languages and machine architectures can be understood and described in terms of the concept of a domain, an abstract entity which defines the access privileges of an executing program to objects in a system. Though the issues of protection and addressing can be treated separately, the realisation of the close relationship between protection and addressing can assist in the implementation of domains using addressing techniques and provides a basis for the comparison of protection systems. Current formal models of protection are seen to aid qualitative comparisons but do not provide an effective yardstick with which to compare protection systems. Based on the ideas of protection through addressing, a protection model is developed from which cost and benefit measures of protection are derived in order to achieve the quantitative comparison methodology. Two detailed examples of the application of the methodology are presented. The first concerns the protection implemented in various Algol W run-time systems, and the second compares the protection system of IBM's 370 DOS/VS operating system with a proposed alternative protection system. Finally, the comparison of protection systems which exploit structure to achieve protection is discussed. The notion of a structured domain is introduced and used in an assessment of the protection afforded by programmer defined types and a supporting architecture.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Science Research Council ; Computing Laboratory, Newcastle University
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.478167  DOI: Not available
Share: