Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Choice and reasoning in the West End house, c. 1765-c. 1785
Author: Stewart, Rachel Elizabeth.
Awarding Body: University of Reading
Current Institution: University of Reading
Date of Award: 2002
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
This thesis explores private and public expectations and perceptions of the West End house in the period c1765 to cl785. By investigating aspects of occupancy or ownership not obviously readable from the house itself, it shows that the town house's significance to its occupants was often far greater and more diverse than its appearance suggests, and it accounts for the terrace house's enduring popularity. Chapter 1 notes the houseowner's absence in the architectural-historical literature on the eighteenth-century town house, and the difficulty of finding or accommodating the house itself within the literature on property ownership, acquisition and transmission. The thesis addresses these deficiencies chiefly through the use of anecdotal, financial and other documentary evidence from papers of families of the landowning classes. Chapter 2 looks at reasons for taking London houses, women's strong associations with them, and houses' practical and more abstract functions, including making a 'proper figure'. Chapter 3 reveals the leasehold house's correspondences with personal rather than real property; the house's prominence in settlements and wills; and its retention within some families, particularly through bequests to widows. Chapter 4 considers what people looked for and how they found it within an active town-house market, and why people were prepared to bear the often damaging cost of house ownership or occupancy. Chapter 5 identifies and explains the discrepancy between public prescriptions and private practice in town-house design. It shows how Robert Adam, in particular, met the terrace house on its own terms and allowed it to come into its own, architecturally, in this period. The house's close associations with women, its ambiguous property status, its commodity attributes, its financial ramifications, and the nature of its architectural and decorative treatments, are used to explain its characterization in the eighteenth century, and more recently, as inconsequential, inconstant, insubstantial, intemperate, and ultimately emasculate.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available