Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: On-farm benefits from soil organic matter in England and Wales
Author: Verheijen, Frank G. A.
Awarding Body: Cranfield University
Current Institution: Cranfield University
Date of Award: 2005
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is increasingly recognised as an important component in the global carbon cycle and as a potential C sequestration pool for mitigation of the enhanced greenhouse effect. Recent appeals have prompted research into the potential of storing C in arable fields and the concomitant impact for on-farm economics. This project was instigated to answer the question “Does soil organic matter (SOM), or its management, provide arable on-farm benefit, in England and Wales?”. A methodological design was developed which integrates social science with soil science. From the National Soil inventory (NSI) database, attainable SOC ranges were estimated for different SOC physiotopes, i.e. landscape units for which the environmental factors governing SOC contents are similar. Significant differences were found, e.g for a dry-sandy physiotope and a wet-clayey physiotope, the ranges were estimated at 0.5-1.6% and 2.0-5.4% SOC (w/w), respectively. A list of qualified ‘SOM benefit’ indicators was developed using an iterative process involving the scientific literature and interviews with ‘expert farmers’. Perceptions of the indicators were investigated within a stratified random sample of commercial farmers. On balance, farmers perceived that benefits of SOM outweighed the disbenefits (i.e. lodging, weeds, and slugs). N fertiliser reduction, increased yield quantity, and enhanced ease of tillage were recognised as the most valuable benefits. However, the values were low to moderate, and perceived to be influenced substantially by physiotope, crop type, and SOM management type. Farmers’ perceptions and valuations were investigated for 101 fields on commercial farms, selected from the NSI database to represent the attainable SOC content ranges. No correlations were found between SOC and any performance indicator. The full range of reported performances was found for fields with similar SOC contents. This implied that SOC contents and SOM management may have little importance to on-farm economics when compared to the quality of overall farm management. These results expose the marginal extent of on-farm benefits from increased SOC contents and SOM management. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.
Supervisor: Kibblewhite, M. G. ; Loveland, P. J. L. Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available