Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.398419
Title: Pseudo-Apollodorus' Bibliotheke and the Greek mythological tradition
Author: Kylintirea, Evangelia.
ISNI:       0000 0001 3603 3849
Awarding Body: University College London (University of London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2002
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Abstract:
Pseudo-Apollodoros' Bibliotheke is undeniably the most useful single source for the mythical tradition of Greece. Enclosing in a short space a remarkable quantity of information, it offers concise and comprehensive accounts of most of the myths that had come to matter beyond local boundaries, providing its readers with their most popular variants. This study concentrates on the most familiar stories contained in the first book of the Bibliotheke and their proper place in the overall structure of Greek mythology. Chapter One is dedicated to the backbone of Apollodoros' work: the chronological organisation of Greek mythical history in genealogies. It discusses the author's individual plan in the arrangement and presentation of his material and his conscious striving for cohesion. Chapters Two and Three are closely linked together: they deal with different stages of the uniquen arrativeo f the succession-mytha,n accountw hich ultimately comes from a single, archaic source (with minor reworkings to agree with the prevailing tradition of the myth from the Hellenistic period onwards), thus reaffirming Apollodoros' predilection for early accounts. The fourth Chapter discusses the myths concerning on the family of Oineus and the participants in the Kalydonian Boar Hunt, while the final Chapter concentrates on the first part of the Argonautic expedition, the voyage to Kolchis, as an indication of how Apollodoros reports the whole of the expedition. This study concludes that the mythographer's main aim is to reproduce a cohesive and faithful summary of the canonical versions of the myths he records, but not necessarily of his sources. Every myth is discussed in the context of the long Greek mythological tradition, giving us a rare insight to Apollodoros' main preoccupations in structuring his work and the handling of his sources, and rewarding us with tantalising glimpses of many Greek myths that are otherwise lost.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.398419  DOI: Not available
Share: