Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.367294
Title: Beach development behind detached breakwaters
Author: Axe, Philip George
ISNI:       0000 0001 3433 7136
Awarding Body: University of Plymouth
Current Institution: University of Plymouth
Date of Award: 2000
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
Concurrent wave and morphology data were collected arow1d a coastal protection scheme on the U.K. south coast. The scheme consists of eight detached breakwaters protecting a renourished sand and shingle beach, and is situated in a strongly macro-tidal environment. The development of the beach morphology is described. The beach trapped sand and shingle moving eastwards into it, and lost material from the eastern end. While the beach was designed to maintain a shingle beach, it was found that the scheme was most effective at trapping sand, which led to tombolo formation behind the updrift breakwaters. Current engineering design methods for describing beach development were applied to the scheme. Empirical techniques were found to be poor predictors of the salient length, although the simplest methods were reasonable guides to the scheme response over a variety of tidal levels. The US Army Corps of Engineers one-line model GENESIS (Hanson, 1989) was applied to the scheme. Using observed values of beach, structure and wave conditions, it was necessary to exaggerate transport due to longshore gradients in wave height relative to transport due to oblique wave approach to correctly describe salient formation. While it was possible to reduce model calibration errors, model validation was not successful. This was due to the inability of the model to allow tombolo formation, and also due to the lack of a 'constant' beach profile, due to the different behaviour of the sand and shingle. Empirical orthogonal function analysis was carried out on the beach survey data. From the limited records available, it was clear that the scheme reduced profile variance behind it, compared to the updrift and downdrift shorelines. The scheme also led to more complex 3D seasonal movements of beach material, in contrast to the predominantly 2D response updrift.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.367294  DOI: Not available
Share: