Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.295348
Title: The impact of King James II on the departments of the royal household
Author: Barclay, Andrew Peter
Awarding Body: University of Cambridge
Current Institution: University of Cambridge
Date of Award: 1994
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
The primary subjects of the thesis are the political activities of the king's servants and the administration of the departments of the royal household during the reign of James II. In order to provide essential background, it does not confine itself just to that reign and so contains new information about the court of Charles II. In chapters one and two the reasons why James appointed the senior servants that he did in 1685 are discussed in order to establish how far they were determined by policy considerations. Chapter three explains the major administrative reforms implemented at the beginning of the reign. These are related to changes which had taken place under his predecessor and the way in which these changes had been interpreted by observers is used to understand the implications of James' s reforms. The repercussions of James's catholicism are dealt with in the fourth chapter which looks at the provisions made for catholic worship at court and attempts to calculate how many catholics were appointed by him to court offices. In the fifth chapter the way in which the other servants responded to the king's pro-catholic policies are discussed. The conclusion that they had mixed feelings but felt obliged to obey is developed in the following chapter analysing events leading up to James's downfall. The strength of James's domestic position is stressed. The final chapter assesses the size of the changes in the personnel of the court in 1689, together with the extent to which those who had been James's servants chose to go with him into exile. It also shows that much of what William III did represented a rejection of James's policies within the royal household.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.295348  DOI: Not available
Keywords: History History
Share: