Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.290393
Title: Criminal injuries compensation : the British experience
Author: Duff, Peter
ISNI:       0000 0000 6645 089X
Awarding Body: University of Aberdeen
Current Institution: University of Aberdeen
Date of Award: 1989
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
The purpose of this thesis is to trace and explain the history and development of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme from its creation in 1964 as a purely administrative arrangement up until, and including, its transition into a statutory creature under the Criminal Justice Act 1988. It is argued that the Scheme is best understood as performing a symbolic function; its purpose is to make a social statement about the victim of violent crime. This thesis is borne out by an examination of the creation and evolution of the Scheme. All aspects of the Scheme are discussed in detail: the procedures through which an award of compensation is made; the way in which the amount of an award is calculated; the scope of the Scheme; and the methods used to ensure that only those who deserve compensation receive awards. As regards each of these major elements of compensation, an account is provided of 1) the process through which the original format of the Scheme came into being, 2) the problems which particular formulations of the rules have caused, 3) the way in which the provisions of the Scheme have evolved to meet these difficulties and 4) the drafting of the new statutory rules. The research was carried out primarily by extensive analysis of official publications and discourse: Parliamentary debates; Command Papers and other such publications; the annual Reports of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board; and legal cases.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.290393  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Law Law Law enforcement Prisons Sociology Human services
Share: