Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.253736
Title: Mechanizing structural induction
Author: Aubin, Raymond
ISNI:       0000 0001 3432 735X
Awarding Body: University of Edinburgh
Current Institution: University of Edinburgh
Date of Award: 1976
Availability of Full Text:
Access through EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access through Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis proposes improved methods for the automatic generation of proofs by structural induction in a formal system. The main application considered is proving properties of programs. The theorem-proving problem divides into two parts: (1) a formal system, and (2) proof generating methods. A formal system is presented which allows for a typed language; thus, abstract data types can be naturally defined in it. Its main feature is a general structural induction rule using a lexicographic ordering based on the substructure ordering induced by type definitions. The proof generating system is carefully introduced in order to convince of its consistency. It is meant to bring solutions to three problems. Firstly, it offers a method for generalizing only certain occurrences of a term in a theorem; this is achieved by associating generalization with the selection of induction variables. Secondly, it treats another generalization problem: that of terms occurring in the positions of arguments which vary within function definitions, besides recursion controlling arguments. The method is called indirect generalization, since it uses specialization as a means of attaining generalization. Thirdly, it presents a sound strategy for using the general induction rule which takes into account all induction subgoals, and for each of them, all induction hypotheses. Only then are the hypotheses retained and instantiated, or rejected altogether, according to their potential usefulness. The system also includes a search mechanism for counter-examples to conjectures, and a fast simplification algorithm.
Supervisor: Milner, Robin ; Burstall, Rod ; Meltzer, Bernard Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.253736  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Proof theory ; Automatic theorem proving ; Induction (Mathematics) Computer software Signal processing Information theory Mathematics
Share: